🔗 Share this article

Last year, star Jude Law remarked he had no concerns about backlash for portraying Vladimir Putin in a cinematic adaptation. The movie, though, could coincide too neatly with the mythologized image promoted by official channels that, within Russia, it functions as a compliment rather than a critique.

The Crafted Superhero

For years, the Russian political apparatus and the country's entertainment industry have worked together to forge a made-to-measure version of the president. This figure is a political superhero without age or mistakes, a former spy reimagined as a local 007 who always knows more than he reveals.

“Domestically, the constructed Putin has long eclipsed the real one.”

Cinematic Reinforcement

A notable instance is a TV series launched last October, directed by a pro-government filmmaker. The protagonist is a invented blue-eyed lieutenant colonel selected by fate to “save” the nation from chaos. Although he is called Mikhail, the implication is unmistakable: the hero must be a familiar security officer.

Western portrayals often end up reinforcing this identical story instead of undercutting it. A new film inspired by a bestselling satirical novel aims to subvert the leader's mythology by framing him not as a cause but as a consequence, shifting the focus to the political machinery around him.

The Myth of the Reluctant Leader

On screen, Putin is shown as having been picked by influential figures to stabilise the nation because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. They visit him and all but beg him to take the top job. His response is that he would prefer to rule from the shadows, desiring permanent power.

This narrative is a key piece of state propaganda: the detached, unwilling mastermind guided by fate. In reality, none of this ever happened.

The Reality of the Casting Call

Nobody actually pleaded with him to accept the role. The presidency was effectively a casting call with no shortage of contenders. Central to this process stood a powerful businessman from the Yeltsin era who expected to run the country de facto.

• His list included several politicians, including a reformer subsequently assassinated and a former spy chief.
• According to an expert who researched his rise, the chosen candidate merely met the required parameters: loyal, from the intelligence world, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A businessman close to the events said the primary requirement was controllability and faithfulness, not strength.

“The goal wasn't a strong candidate, they needed someone controllable, someone who would follow instructions.”

Building the 007 Persona

Experts agree that the image of Putin as a master operative was built after the fact. Claims about his “recruitment work” in Dresden do not stand up to scrutiny. Fundamentally, he handled paperwork and routine duties, a mid-level functionary not involved with field operations.

Curiously, the move to depicting him as a “007” could partly have been inspired by Daniel Craig’s debut as 007. His harder interpretation led Russian media and online audiences to draw visual parallels with their leader. Edited images swapping Craig’s face with his surfaced on Moscow streets, fueling the growing tendency to see him as a local secret agent.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

Given the casting, an star popular with Russian audiences, the authorities are likely to seize the opportunity to frame his casting as a minor diplomatic triumph. Its omission of mass protests, the political rivals, or key figures from its narrative, even though it includes the past decade, is a welcome aspect for official messaging.

In Russian cinema, Putin is often an omnipotent figure who never appears on screen. His influence is signaled through portraits or orders from on high. Now, he finally acquires a recognizable face—one that may inadvertently echo the exact legends it might seek to examine.