🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents applauding your insights on expanding your business? Do recruiters reaching out to explore opportunities?

If not, the reason could be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Modifying Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Numerous women participated in a collective LinkedIn experiment this week after popular discussions suggested that changing their profile gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants rewrote their profiles to include what they termed "bro-coded" language - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure also improved.

Systemic Preference Questions Brought Up

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm favors men who employ professional networking terminology.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which posts are shown to which users - boosting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how content perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not influence how your content appears in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who changed her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her name to "a masculine version", described remarkable outcomes.

"The numbers I'm seeing indicate a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she noted.

Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after observing her reach decline significantly.

The Method

• First, she changed her gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her profile using "masculine-oriented" language
• Finally, she recycled old posts with similar "agentic" language

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Downside

Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Before, my content were more personal - concise and insightful, but also friendly and human," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was assertive and confident - similar to a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after one week, stating "Every day I continued, and results improved, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Some participants encountered positive outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's unique role as both a professional network and community site.

Platform modifications in the past few months have apparently caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in informal experiments where identical posts by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to classify and spread content based on various elements, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company states it regularly evaluates its systems, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in certain members' visibility might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she commented. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."