🔗 Share this article

In contemporary Britain, public demonstration has ceased to be a basic freedom. Rather, it has become a conditional permission that those in power grant or deny at their discretion. This constitutes the implication of new regulations that the current government is putting forward, which would dictate when and where demonstrations can occur, with potential prison sentences for those who disobey these restrictions.

Erosion of Democratic Rights

Previous governments had already undermined this essential right: the former Conservative government had given law enforcement sweeping additional powers, which global rights bodies had censured as "significant and unjustified restrictions" on democratic freedoms. Collectively, these incremental assaults on freedom have practically eliminated the historically earned right to freedom of protest.

Exploiting Atrocity to Justify Suppression

The most recent restrictive measures are being defended by citing last week's heinous anti-Jewish attack on a British mosque. We can all agree on widespread consensus that the security of Jewish communities in Britain must be safeguarded. However, employing this atrocity as a justification to stifle dissent is not only disconnected to that duty but distorts it.

"If you cannot draw the line at genocide, you probably can't establish limits at democracy," commented a well-known American author, whose words that rings true for the present administration.

Historical Context of Demonstration

Consider Britain's long tradition of protest and activism against racial discrimination and fascism, from the 1936 Battle of Cable Street to postwar Jewish groups opposing fascism and the 1970s mobilizations against the far-right organization. Many of these historical demonstrators were labeled as radicals in their era, even while they were advocating the freedoms of minorities.

Current Reality

In the current complicated landscape, here's what's actually occurring: Israel – a foreign state – is committing acts that international bodies have described as systematic destruction. Its warfare have prompted the International Criminal Court to release arrest warrants against Benjamin Netanyahu and his ex-military leader.

Western public opinion has shifted dramatically against Israel's military campaign. In Britain, a large percentage of citizens believe Israel has likely committed international law violations. Most people would endorse a complete ban on arms sales to the nation, and back the arrest of Netanyahu.

Silencing Dissent

Having essentially lost the argument, pro-Israel advocates are now seizing on a despicable antisemitic crime to try to suppress a mass movement against a ethical disaster. The British government seems included in this attempt. Government officials have failed to implement comprehensive sanctions on Israel and have allowed weapon shipments to continue.

People who are demonstrating against the destruction of Gaza have been labeled as hateful extremists. Yet there's a significant reason why there hasn't been a more extensive suppression on these demonstrators until now: very limited protesters have made genuinely hateful statements about Jewish people, giving law enforcement minimal reason to intervene.

Problematic Association

Equating Jewish heritage with the policies of the Israeli state is not only cynical but also dangerous. The official definition of antisemitism, accepted by the British government and many organizations, has been rightly questioned for potentially stifling legitimate criticism of Israel. However, there should be universal agreement about one of its key examples: that "making Jewish people generally accountable for decisions of the state of Israel" constitutes antisemitism.

Escalating Restrictions

This is why we've arrived at a point where police authorities can suggest that protests opposing Israel's policies should be called off because they might "inadvertently or intentionally" endorse anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, political figures have declared that recognition of Palestinian statehood has made organizations "complicit" in supposed mistreatment faced by Jewish communities.

Double Standards

On the same day as the religious center assault, the Israel's army killed dozens of Palestinian civilians in Gaza – increasing the terrible count from 24 months of daily atrocities that have taken tens of thousands of human lives. British political leaders and media outlets have hardly hidden the minimal importance they attach to Palestinian life. This represents one of the boldest demonstrations of discrimination in our time.

Crossing Thresholds

Our government has already crossed a concerning boundary by banning a specific activist group, a non-violent, human rights-focused direct action organization. Thousands of British demonstrators have been arrested, mostly for holding signs against mass killing and supporting the banned organization. Many of those arrested are elderly citizens; including a retired priest and the child of a World War II genocide survivor.

International Parallels

It's easy to see where this path leads. In the United States, government officials helped vilify pro-Palestinian protests: a ex-political leader implied that some were "connected to" foreign governments, while the sitting leader described such demonstrations as antisemitic. In doing so, they helped legitimize the authoritarian crackdown on such protests – and on free speech in general.

Looking Ahead

If a conservative administration comes to power, it would be given extensive authority to suppress dissent. What might a Reform government do with this repressive toolkit? Our ancestors struggled, endured hardship and sacrificed their lives to establish our freedoms. We may eventually rue how easily we permitted them to be eroded.